COTSIFAS v. CONRAD

9302-01112; CA A84668.

905 P.2d 851 (1995)

137 Or. App. 468

George COTSIFAS, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. Russell F. CONRAD, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and Theodore F. Calouri and Sherrie Calouri, his wife, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 8, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Birnie, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant-cross-respondent.

David H. DeBlasio, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent-cross-appellant.

Before WARREN, P.J., and LANDAU and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


LANDAU, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals and defendant1 cross-appeals from a judgment declaring that plaintiff may not use an easement across defendant's property for access by motor vehicle. Plaintiff argues that his express easement provides him unrestricted reasonable use of the easement. Defendant argues that the trial court should have extinguished the easement entirely. On de novo review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases