1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 908 P.2d
  5. 908 P.2d 838 (1995)
 

HOLLAND v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH

95-049; CA A90660.

908 P.2d 838 (1995)

138 Or. App. 340

David HOLLAND, Petitioner, v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 27, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Cox, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Daniel H. Kearns, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Preston Gates & Ellis.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's affirmance of the City of Cannon Beach's denial of his subdivision application. Petitioner's principal argument is that the city violated ORS 227.173 and erred in other respects by basing its decision on policies in its comprehensive plan rather than standards and criteria set forth in its "development ordinance." LUBA rejected that argument and the others that petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases