1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 72 F.3d
  5. 72 F.3d 101 (1995)
 

U.S. v. ONO

No. 95-50099.

72 F.3d 101 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Masuru ONO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 22, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul M. Ono, Phoenix, Arizona, pro se.

Jeffrey C. Eglash, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: PREGERSON, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Federal prisoner Paul Masuru Ono appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to modify his term of imprisonment. The government contends that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was filed more than ten days after the order was entered by the district court. See Fed. R.App.P. 4(b).

In order to determine if an appeal is a "criminal case" under Fed.R.App.P. 4(b), we consider...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases