1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 885 F.Supp.
  5. 885 F.Supp. 849 (1995)
 

STATE OF QATAR v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF VIRGINIA

Civ. A. No. 1:94cv1081.

885 F.Supp. 849 (1995)

The STATE OF QATAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a First Union National Bank of Virginia, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

May 3, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorothy B. Fountain, Richard L. Cys, Davis, Wright, Fremaine, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs.

Daniel S. Fiore, Arlington, VA, Grady C. Frank, Jr., Hazel & Thomas, P.C., Alexandria, VA, for First Union Nat. Bank of Virginia.

Robert K. Richardson, Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C., Fairfax, VA, for Central Fidelity Banks, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

At issue in this sequel to State of Qatar v. First American Bank of Virginia ("Qatar I")1 is the meaning and legal significance of the phrase "for deposit only" following an indorsement on the back of a check. More specifically, the question presented is whether a depositary bank complies with the restrictive indorsement "for deposit only" when it deposits a check bearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases