TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION v. CITY OF BEAVERTON

LUBA Nos. 94-002, 94-003; CA A89709.

906 P.2d 827 (1995)

138 Or. App. 48

TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. CITY OF BEAVERTON and Henry Kane, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 29, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Greenfield, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Gregory S. Hathaway and Davis Wright Tremaine, Portland.

Mark Pilliod, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent City of Beaverton.

No appearance for respondent Henry Kane.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

In Tri-Met v. City of Beaverton, 132 Or.App. 253, 888 P.2d 74, rev. den. 320 Or. 598, 891 P.2d 1 (1995), we reversed and remanded LUBA's decisions in Tri-Met's appeals from conditions that the city had attached to its design review approvals of two segments of the Westside Corridor light rail project. On remand, LUBA remanded the city's decisions to it for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases