1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 901 P.2d
  5. 901 P.2d 819 (1995)
 

PIERCE v. OKLAHOMA PROPERTY AND CAS. INS.

No. 81774.

901 P.2d 819 (1995)

April Lynette PIERCE, Appellee, v. OKLAHOMA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 11, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Rinehart, Rinehart, Rinehart & Rinehart, P.C., El Reno, for appellee.

Regena K. McNeill, Elizabeth J. Sloan, Durbin, Larimore & Bialick, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

SUMMERS, Justice:

Our answer to this first impression question will determine whether a liability insurer, by a policy endorsement specifically excluding a certain named driver, may avoid liability for damages occurring when the forbidden driver drives with consent of the insured person. We hold that such a named driver exclusion does not violate Oklahoma's public policy regarding compulsory liability insurance, and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases