1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 898 F.Supp.
  5. 898 F.Supp. 811 (1995)
 

MURPHY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM ANIMAL HEALTH GROUP

Civ. A. No. 95-1002-DES.

898 F.Supp. 811 (1995)

Roger MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM ANIMAL HEALTH GROUP, A Pennsylvania Partnership and its Partners; SmithKline Beecham Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation; Norden Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Adams Pharmaceutical, Inc., a Florida Corporation; and Beecham, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

September 21, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory L. Bauer, Bauer, Pike, Pike & Johnson, Chtd., Great Bend, KS, James A. Davis, Davis & Associates, P.C., Fremont, NE, for plaintiff.

Carol A. Beier, Foulston & Siefkin, Wichita, KS, Scott A. Smith, Janell M. Gabor, Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman, Minneapolis, MN, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 13).

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiff, Roger Murphy ("Murphy"), is a resident of the state of Kansas engaged in the cattle feeding business. The defendant, SmithKline Beecham Corporation ("SmithKline"), is a Pennsylvania corporation, and is the successor-in-interest to SmithKline Beecham...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases