1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 33 Cal.App.4th
  5. 33 Cal.App.4th 1671 (1995)
 

CITY OF CUPERTINO v. CITY OF SAN JOSE

Docket No. A065542.

33 Cal.App.4th 1671 (1995)

40 Cal. Rptr.2d 171

CITY OF CUPERTINO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

April 12, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, E. Clement Shute, Jr., and Tamara S. Galanter for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Joan R. Gallo, City Attorney, George Rios, Assistant City Attorney, Joseph DiCiuccio and Glenn D. Schwarzbach, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

PETERSON, P.J.

In this case, we will hold that the regional welfare doctrine adopted by our Supreme Court in Associated Home Builders etc. Inc. v. City of Livermore (1976) 18 Cal.3d 582 [135 Cal.Rptr. 41, 557 P.2d 473, 92 A.L.R.3d 1038] (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases