TUCKER v. OCHSNER HEALTH PLAN

No. 95-CC-2234.

662 So.2d 1037 (1995)

Austin TUCKER and Beverly Tucker v. OCHSNER HEALTH PLAN d/b/a Ochsner Preferred Choice.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 17, 1995.


Not considered. Not timely filed.

CALOGERO, C.J., dissents and assigns reasons.

CALOGERO, Chief Justice, dissenting.

I disagree with the majority's decision not to consider this writ application because the filing in the Court of Appeal was allegedly untimely under Uniform Rule-Courts of Appeal 4-3. Under La. Const. of 1974 Art. V, § 5, this Court has general supervisory jurisdiction over all other courts. Our constitutional authority is not diminished...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases