1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 59 F.3d
  5. 59 F.3d 109 (1995)
 

OLIVARES v. MARSHALL

Nos. 94-15518, 94-15526.

59 F.3d 109 (1995)

Steve OLIVARES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, J. Hixon and D. Helsel, Defendants-Appellees. James F. STEHOUWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HENNESSEY, Sheriff; Sergeant Nelson; Deputy Gee; Deputy Antram; Deputy Williams; and Internal Affairs, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 26, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sanford Jay Rosen, Rosen, Bien & Asaro, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellant.

James M. Humes, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, CA, for appellees-amicus Marshall, et al.; Matthew D. Davis, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees Hennessey, et al.

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

James Stehouwer and Steve Olivares submitted to the district court unrelated pro se civil rights complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both moved the court for permission to proceed in forma pauperis, without prepayment of filing fees, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) which permits a district court to waive the customary $120 filing fee upon a finding that the plaintiff is unable to pay. In a joint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases