KANE v. KULONGOSKI

SC S42183, SC S42184.

895 P.2d 783 (1995)

321 Or. 240

Henry KANE, Petitioner, v. Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent, James L. Posey and Jann Carson, Intervenors. James L. POSEY and Jann Carson, Petitioners, v. Theodore KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided June 2, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Kane, petitioner pro se, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the petition.

Katherine A. McDowell, of ACLU Foundation of Oregon, Inc., Portland, argued the cause for petitioners James L. Posey and Jann Carson. With her on the petition was Paul E. Loving.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the answering memoranda were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.


PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated original proceedings, petitioners challenge the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioners are electors who timely submitted written comments addressed to the Attorney General's draft ballot title. Therefore, they are entitled to petition this court seeking a different title. ORS 250.085(2).

The Attorney General certified this ballot title to the Secretary of State:

ENDS MOST GOVERNMENT AFFIRMATIVE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases