In this case we have explored the difficult question of the extent to which a police officer may rely upon computer-generated data furnished by the judicial system in carrying out searches and seizures. We conclude, consistent with the recent announcement by the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v. Evans (1995) 514 U.S. ___ [131 L.Ed.2d 34, 115 S.Ct. 1185],
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DOWNING
Docket No. D020943.
33 Cal.App.4th 1641 (1995)
40 Cal. Rptr.2d 176
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RUSSELL JOHN DOWNING, Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 13, 1995.
April 13, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Edwin L. Miller, Jr., and Paul J. Pfingst, District Attorneys, Thomas F. McArdle and Patricia O'Mara, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Francis J. Bardsley, Public Defender, Terry Zimmerman and Gary R. Nichols, Deputy Public Defenders, for Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
