1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 907 S.W.2d
  5. 907 S.W.2d 766 (1995)
 

HOY v. KY INDUS. REVITALIZATION AUTH.

No. 94-SC-949-TG.

907 S.W.2d 766 (1995)

Thomas A. HOY, Appellant, v. KENTUCKY INDUSTRIAL REVITALIZATION AUTHORITY and General Electric Company, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

October 19, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. Bolzle, L. Jay Gilbert, Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, Louisville, for Appellant.

Robert W. Griffith, Brooks D. Kubik, E. Scott Fruehwald, Stites & Harbison, Louisville, R. Douglas Martin, Cabinet for Economic Development, Frankfort, for Appellee, Kentucky Industrial Revitalization Authority.

Donald L. Cox, Mary Janice Lintner, Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Mahan, P.S.C., Louisville, for Appellee, General Electric Company.

STUMBO, Justice.

This is an appeal from summary judgment denying the relief Appellant sought under the Open Records Act, KRS 61.870 et seq.

On February 5, 1993, the General Electric Company ("GE"), filed an application with the Kentucky Industrial Revitalization Authority ("KIRA") pursuant to KRS 154.26010 for investment tax credits to support the renovation of its laundry machine manufacturing facility in Louisville, Kentucky. Pursuant to KRS 154.26...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases