1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 899 S.W.2d
  5. 899 S.W.2d 749 (1995)
 

BELL v. SHOWA DENKO K.K.

No. 07-94-0138-CV.

899 S.W.2d 749 (1995)

Savannah BELL, Appellant, v. SHOWA DENKO K.K. d/b/a Showa Denko; Showa Denko America, Inc. d/b/a Showa Denko; Whole Foods, Inc.; Fitness Foods, Inc.; Roy's Nutrition Center, Inc. and Makers of Kal, Inc., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

Rehearing Overruled June 23, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen Rolston Robbins, Houston, for appellant.

Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, Matthew D. Slater, Julie A. Waddell, Washington, DC, and Strasburger & Price, Rowland Foster, Mark M. Donheiser and Dennis L. Roossien, Jr., Dallas, for Showa Denko, Fitness Foods, Roy's Nutrition and KAL.

Small, Craig & Werkenthin, Susan L. Moore, Austin, for Whole Foods.

Before REYNOLDS, C.J., and BOYD and QUINN, JJ.

BOYD, Justice.

Appellant Savannah Bell brings this appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment in favor of appellees Showa Denko K.K. d/b/a Showa Denko, Showa Denko America, Inc. d/b/a Showa Denko, Whole Foods, Inc., Fitness Foods, Inc., Roy's Nutrition Center, Inc. and Makers of KAL, Inc. In three points of error, she urges the trial court erred in 1) granting appellees' motions for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations as a genuine issue of material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases