1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 65 F.3d
  5. 65 F.3d 1577 (1995)
 

QUANTUM CORP. v. RODIME, PLC

No. 94-1296.

65 F.3d 1577 (1995)

QUANTUM CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RODIME, PLC, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined November 27, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Lynch, Attorney, Arnold, White & Durkee, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Richard L. Stanley, J. Mike Amerson, and Gary J. Fischman; David B. Harrison, Quantum Corporation, Milpitas, CA, and Terence M. Fruth, Fruth and Anthony, PA., Minneapolis, MN, of counsel.

Margaret F. Pfeiffer, Attorney, Sullivan and Cromwell, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant; Robert A. Sacks, Sullivan and Cromwell, Washington, DC, and John C. Altmiller, Kenyon and Kenyon, Washington, DC, of counsel.

Before PLAGER, LOURIE, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined November 27, 1995.

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

The question in this declaratory judgment action is whether amendments made during a prior reexamination proceeding impermissibly broadened the scope of the patent claims at issue in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 305 (1988),1 and, if so, the legal effect thereof. Defendant patentee Rodime PLC (Rodime) appeals the decision of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases