HUFFMAN v. LEON DE MENDOZA

9300538CV and 9301365CV; CA A83260 (Control) and CA A83261.

899 P.2d 734 (1995)

135 Or. App. 680

Bruce HUFFMAN, Appellant, v. Frank Robert LEON DE MENDOZA, Respondent. Bruce HUFFMAN, Appellant, v. Frank Robert Leon DE MENDOZA and Javier Mendoza Mendoza, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 26, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

David Gilstrap, Ashland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Davis, Gilstrap, Harris, Hearn & Welty, P.C.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from an amended judgment, which set aside an earlier default judgment in plaintiff's favor, and from a supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to defendant Frank Leon De Mendoza (Frank). We affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. In August 1990, Frank entered into a retainer agreement with plaintiff, who is an attorney. Shortly thereafter, Frank transferred some real property located in Klamath County to his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases