CATIZONE v. MEMRY CORP.

No. 91 Civ. 8023 (RLC).

897 F.Supp. 732 (1995)

Pat CATIZONE, Plaintiff, v. MEMRY CORP., American Stock Transfer & Trust Co., and Neil E. Rogen, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 25, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold Davis, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Rubin, Hay & Gould, P.C., Framingham, Massachusetts (Rodney E. Gould) of counsel, for Defendant Neil E. Rogen.

Whitman & Ransom, Greenwich, Connecticut (James C. Riley, of counsel), for Defendants Memry Corp. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co.


ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

Defendants Memry Corp. ("Memry") and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co. ("AST & T") move for summary judgment on each count of plaintiff's complaint, with respect to their affirmative defense, and with respect to their counterclaim for interpleader. Defendant Neil E. Rogen moves for summary judgment on plaintiff's cause of action alleging that Rogen blocked the transfer of stock to plaintiff.

I. Background

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases