1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 877 F.Supp.
  5. 877 F.Supp. 750 (1995)
 

ARMSTRONG v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT

Civ. A. No. 89-142 (CRR).

877 F.Supp. 750 (1995)

Scott ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF the PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

As Changed February 28, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Tankersley, for Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, argued the case, for plaintiffs. With him on the brief was Alan B. Morrison, for Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC.

Anthony J. Coppolino, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., argued the case for, defendants. With him on the brief was Jason R. Baron, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Frank W. Hunger, Asst. U.S. Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Eric H. Holder, U.S. Atty. for, District of Columbia, David J. Anderson and Elizabeth A. Pugh, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Washington, DC.

MEMORANDUM OPINION OF CHARLES R. RICHEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is the Defendants' Motion and Memorandum seeking a Stay Pending Appeal of this Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on February 14, 1995, ___ F.Supp. ___, which held, inter alia, that the National Security Council is an "agency" subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Upon careful consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases