PETERSEN v. GANGLE

16-93-08725; CA A84333.

899 P.2d 725 (1995)

135 Or. App. 514

Carl A. PETERSEN, Appellant, v. Jim GANGLE, Patricia Siegmund and Lane County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 19, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Thomas Evans, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

David B. Williams, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Lane County Office of Legal Counsel.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


De MUNIZ, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after the court granted defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The judgment foreclosed plaintiff's interest in certain real properties for failure to pay property taxes, subject to plaintiff's right of redemption and payment of interest. We reverse and remand.

Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no disputed issues of material fact...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases