SOUTHWALL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CARDINAL IG CO.

No. 94-1243.

54 F.3d 1570 (1995)

SOUTHWALL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARDINAL IG COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined June 21, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Noemi C. Espinosa, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, of Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on brief were William L. Anthony, Jr. and Douglas C. Rawles. Of counsel was Luther Kent Orton.

V. Bryan Medlock, Jr., Richards, Medlock & Andrews, of Dallas, TX, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on brief was Paul V. Storm.

Before MICHEL, LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined June 21, 1995.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Southwall Technologies, Inc. (Southwall) appeals the March 2, 1994 decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Docket No. C-92-0327-DLJ, granting summary judgment for Cardinal IG Company (Cardinal) that Cardinal's LOE2 window glazing product cannot infringe Southwall's Reexamined U.S. Patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases