1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 68 F.3d
  5. 68 F.3d 1529 (1995)
 

GONZALEZ v. AMR SERVICES CORP.

No. 273, Docket 95-7283.

68 F.3d 1529 (1995)

Jose GONZALEZ, Russell Carpino and George Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of all Other Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, William Martin and Joe Velez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMR SERVICES CORPORATION, a Subsidiary of AMR Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided October 31, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Greenspan, Law Offices of Richard M. Greenspan, P.C., Ardsley, N.Y., for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Edward A. Brill, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: FEINBERG, OAKES and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs William Martin and Joe Velez appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge), granting summary judgment in favor of their former employer, defendant AMR Services Corporation ("AMR"), in an action brought pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act ("WARN Act"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109. 877 F.Supp. 108

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases