In this product liability case, the court granted a nonsuit after plaintiff's opening statement, even though it was conceded that plaintiff had stated a prima facie case under the "risk-benefit" theory of Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BRESNAHAN v. CHRYSLER CORP.
Docket No. B072243.
32 Cal.App.4th 1559 (1995)
38 Cal. Rptr.2d 446
MARY BRESNAHAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 14, 1995.
February 14, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mukesh Advani, Grayson, Grayson & Mansell and Robert Mansell for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Sidney K. Kanazawa, Sabina A. Helton, Hogan & Hartson and Terri A. Steinhaus for Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
