1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 63 F.3d
  5. 63 F.3d 95 (1995)
 

U.S. v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

No. 1364, Docket 94-6190.

63 F.3d 95 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK CO., A Corporation of New Jersey, and Eastman Kodak Co., A Corporation of New York, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided August 4, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane P. Wood, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, DC (Anne K. Bingaman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Catherine G. O'Sullivan, Robert B. Nicholson, Robert J. Wiggers, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, of counsel) for plaintiff-appellant.

David M. Lascell, Rochester, NY (Hallenbeck, Lascell, Norris & Zorn, Rochester, NY, Robert B. Bell, Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, DC, of counsel) for defendants-appellees.

Before MINER and JACOBS, Circuit Judges, and CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

MINER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant, the United States of America, appeals from an order entered on May 20, 1994 in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Telesca, Chief Judge) granting a motion made by defendant-appellee Eastman Kodak Co. ("Kodak") to terminate two antitrust consent decrees. The first decree was entered in 1921 ("the 1921 Decree") after a finding by the district court that Kodak had monopolized the sale...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases