SAFETY KLEEN CORP. v. RIDLEY

No. 94-1819.

666 So.2d 913 (1995)

SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, Appellant, v. Harold RIDLEY and Kathy Ridley, his wife, and Calhoun County, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Order Granting One Motion for Clarification, Denying Another Motion for Clarification, Denying Rehearing, and Certifying Question July 26, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis J. Carroll, Jr., Boehm, Brown, Rigdon, Seacrest & Fischer, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

William D. Hall, Jr., Barrett, Hoffman, Hall and Enfinger, Tallahassee, and Gordon D. Cherr, McConnaughhay, Roland, Maida & Cherr, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellees Ridley.

Timothy M. Werner, Burke & Blue, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee Calhoun County.


WOLF, Judge.

Appellant, Safety Kleen Corporation, appeals the denial of a motion for a new trial following a jury trial in which the appellee and plaintiff below, Harold Ridley, was awarded damages in an action arising out of an automobile accident in Blountstown, Florida.

Appellant raises three issues before this court. The first point on appeal is whether or not the trial court erred in refusing to give appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases