KLEIN, Judge.
Appellant argues for a reversal of her conviction for purchasing cocaine because the evidence was insufficient, because the court did not give a lesser included instruction, and because the prosecutor referred to a cocaine pipe found in appellant's purse which the state had not disclosed during discovery. We reverse because of the reference to the pipe.
Appellant, along with two other people who were occupying the same vehicle, became involved...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.