1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 35 Cal.App.4th
  5. 35 Cal.App.4th 1535 (1995)
 

LOS ANGELES POLICE v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. B077854.

35 Cal.App.4th 1535 (1995)

42 Cal. Rptr.2d 23

LOS ANGELES POLICE PROTECTIVE LEAGUE et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

June 21, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Frederick N. Merkin and Leslie E. Brown, Assistant City Attorneys, for Defendants and Appellants.

Gregory G. Petersen and Larry J. Roberts for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

BOREN, P.J.

State law protects public safety officers from being compelled to submit to polygraph examinations against their will. (Gov. Code. § 3307.)1 We conclude that a city police department may require a polygraph examination for officers who voluntarily seek to be promoted or transferred into a few specialized divisions where the work is unusually sensitive and requires the highest level...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases