1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 908 S.W.2d
  5. 908 S.W.2d 660 (1995)
 

SWINK v. ERNST & YOUNG

No. 95-234.

908 S.W.2d 660 (1995)

322 Ark. 417

James SWINK, Jr., Appellant, v. ERNST & YOUNG, d/b/a Richard J. Shelton, Jr., Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

November 13, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donna J. Wolfe, Little Rock, for appellant.

J. Andrew Heaton, Washington, D.C., William H. Sutton, Kevin A. Crass, Jonann C. Roosevelt, Little Rock, for appellee.

GLAZE, Justice.

In this appeal, appellant James Swink, Jr., contends the trial court erred in granting the Ernst & Young accounting firm's ARCP Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Swink's complaint. On February 2, 1994, Swink, Jr., brought this suit individually, but his allegations and request for damages were based upon a 1985 contract between Swink & Company, Inc. and Ernst & Young. Under that contract, Ernst & Young agreed to examine, report, review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases