1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 874 F.Supp.
  5. 874 F.Supp. 687 (1995)
 

CANE v. WORCESTER COUNTY, MD.

Civ. No. Y-92-3226.

874 F.Supp. 687 (1995)

Honiss W. CANE, Jr., et al. v. WORCESTER COUNTY, MARYLAND, et al.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

January 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Christopher Brown, Baltimore, MD, and Deborah A. Jeon, Cambridge, MD, for plaintiffs.

Edward H. Hammond, Jr., Ocean City, MD, and Benjamin E. Griffith, Cleveland, MS, for defendants.

OPINION

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.

In Cane v. Worcester County, 35 F.3d 921 (4th Cir.1994), the Fourth Circuit affirmed the Court's finding that the at-large electoral system used by Worcester County ("County") for election of the County Board of Commissioners ("Board") was violative of § 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases