1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 103 Ohio
  5. 103 Ohio App.3d 53 (1995)
 

HINCKLEY v. KRANTZ

No. 67756.

103 Ohio App.3d 53 (1995)

HINCKLEY et al., Appellants, v. KRANTZ et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.

Decided April 24, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sindell, Lowe & Guidubaldi and Claudia R. Eklund, for appellants.

Albert J. Rhoa, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

An accelerated appeal is authorized pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc. App.R. 25. The purpose of an accelerated docket is to allow an appellate court to render a brief and conclusionary decision. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d 158, 11 OBR 240, 463 N.E.2d 655; App.R. 11.1(E).

Plaintiff-appellant Becky Hinckley...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases