1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 32 Cal.App.4th
  5. 32 Cal.App.4th 1511 (1995)
 

WIMSATT v. BEVERLY HILLS WEIGHT ETC. INTERNAT.

Docket No. G013719.

32 Cal.App.4th 1511 (1995)

38 Cal. Rptr.2d 612

LLOYD P. WIMSATT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BEVERLY HILLS WEIGHT LOSS CLINICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

March 3, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Waier & Urtnowski and Randall S. Waier for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

R. Patrick McCullogh, Saxon, Dean, Mason, Brewer & Kincannon, Bruce G. Holden, Rodney W. Bell, W. Charles Hughes and Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

California's Franchise Investment Law was intended for precisely this case. The law's statement of legislative intent declares that "California franchisees have suffered substantial losses where the franchisor or his representative has not provided full and complete information regarding the franchisor-franchisee relationship, the details of the contract between franchisor and franchisee, and the prior business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases