RE-OPEN RAMBLA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Defendants and Appellants; CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MALIBU, Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 9, 1995.
November 9, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
COUNSEL
Wasserman, Comden & Casselman, David B. Casselman, Catherine S. Garcia and Paul Kujawsky for Defendants and Appellants.
Scott L. Grady, Robert A. Karpuk, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Gideon Kanner and M. Reed Hunter for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
Christi Hogin, City Attorney, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Steven H. Kaufmann and Michael G. Colantuono for Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.
OPINION
ORTEGA, J.
A portion of Rambla Pacifico Road1 in what is now the City of Malibu (City) and earlier was within the County of Los Angeles (County) was blocked by earth movement and closed by the County in 1984. Re-Open Rambla, Inc. (ROR), whose members include affected homeowners, wants the Road reopened but first must determine who owns the portion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.