1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 899 P.2d
  5. 899 P.2d 624 (1995)
 

MUSKOGEE URBAN RENEWAL v. EXCISE BD.

No. 74424.

899 P.2d 624 (1995)

MUSKOGEE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY and the City of Muskogee, Appellees, v. The EXCISE BOARD OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY, and Muskogee County, Oklahoma, Appellants, and First National Bank & Trust Company, Intervenor.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 27, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John David Luton, Asst. Dist. Atty., Muskogee County, for appellant.

Steve Cousparis and Robert DuPriest, Muskogee, for appellees.

A. Carl Robinson, Robinson, Locke, Gage, Fite & Williams, Muskogee, for intervenor.

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

The first impression issue presented in this appeal is whether tax increment financing of urban renewal costs violates the state constitution. We hold that the statutory scheme for financing and paying the costs of urban renewal established in 11 O.S.Supp. 1983, § 38-115 and § 38-120, et seq., does not in and of itself contravene the provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases