1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 912 P.2d
  5. 912 P.2d 610 (1995)
 

GUMPRECHT v. DOYLE

No. 21125.

912 P.2d 610 (1995)

128 Idaho 242

Thomas GUMPRECHT, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross Respondent, v. Colin DOYLE, Daniel Miller, Richard Young and Valley Ear, Nose and Throat, P.A., Defendants-Respondents-Cross Appellants.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Lewiston, April 1995 Term.

Rehearing Denied September 25, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mosman Law Offices, Moscow, for appellant. Wynn R. Mosman argued.

Randall, Blake & Cox, P.A., Lewiston, for respondent. Joseph A. Wright argued.

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

I.

BACKGROUND AND FACTS

Dr. Thomas Gumprecht (Gumprecht), seeks to recover statutory penalties pursuant to I.C. § 30-1-52 on the grounds that Valley Ear, Nose and Throat, P.A. (VENT), Dr. Colin Doyle (Doyle), Dr. Daniel Miller (Miller), and Mr. Richard Young (Young) denied Gumprecht access to the corporate records of VENT.1 Gumprecht joined Doyle and Miller in practice at VENT on October...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases