INTERPOOL LTD. v. PATTERSON

No. 89 Civ. 8501 (LAK).

874 F.Supp. 616 (1995)

INTERPOOL LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. Barry PATTERSON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 26, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lloyd Clareman, New York City, for plaintiff.

William Roth and Lisa Frey, Kelly & Roth, New York City, for defendants George Novo, Sumo Enterprises, Inc., Dockside Intern. Co., Miami Container Repair Co., and Intermodal Services of Florida, Inc.

Keith L. Flicker and John Karpousis, Flicker, Garelick & Associates, New York City, for defendants Richard Cuneo, Genco Associates, Inc. and Container Options, Inc.


OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

This is an action for alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), common law fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty against eight individual and corporate defendants.

In brief summary, Interpool Ltd., a publicly held company engaged in the intermodal equipment leasing business,1 claimed that Barry Patterson and Richard Cuneo, two of its former sales...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases