1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 888 P.2d
  5. 888 P.2d 597 (1995)
 

FOPPO v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

UP-51-91; CA A81631.

888 P.2d 597 (1995)

132 Or.App. 406

FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Oregon, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and County of Multnomah, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 18, 1995.

Review Allowed April 18, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daryl S. Garrettson, Eugene, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief was Hoag, Vick, Tarantino & Garrettson.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause, for respondent State. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.

RIGGS, Judge.

The Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation Officers (FOPPO) seeks review of an Employment Relations Board (ERB) order. The order determines that the state did not commit an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain with FOPPO regarding the impacts of an intergovernmental agreement to transfer certain corrections officers from state employment to employment by Multnomah County. We reverse and remand.

This is the second time this case has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases