1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 876 F.Supp.
  5. 876 F.Supp. 605 (1995)
 

GNB BATTERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. EXIDE CORP.

Civ. A. No. 88-407-RRM.

876 F.Supp. 605 (1995)

GNB BATTERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. EXIDE CORPORATION and General Battery Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

February 10, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Richards, III, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE, Gordon R. Coons, Charles H. Mottier, Pamela J. Ruschau, Leydig, Voit & Mayers, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.

Paul E. Crawford, James D. Heisman, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, DE, Frank J. Benasutti, Benasutti, P.C., Wynnewood, PA, for defendants.

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

In this patent case, the defendants have moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 49(b). The facts of this case are more fully set forth in the court's Opinion of February 10, 1995, 876 F.Supp. 582, on defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, a new trial. The parties have briefed the issue and this is the court's decision on defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases