HASKELL CO. v. PEEPLES CONST. CO. INC.

No. 93-2453.

648 So.2d 833 (1995)

The HASKELL COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. PEEPLES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Rehearing Denied February 2, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Brinton and Lisa L. Pickert of Allen, Brinton & Simmons, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Jack W. Shaw, Jr. and Herbert R. Kanning of Osborne, McNatt, Shaw, O'Hara, Brown & Obringer, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellees.


WOLF, Judge.

The Haskell Company (Haskell), appellant, raises four issues on appeal only one of which has merit. We will briefly discuss two issues: (1) Whether the trial court erroneously interpreted the 45-day notice provision in section 255.05(2), Florida Statutes, as requiring the appellant, Haskell (sub-subcontractor), to give notice to the appellee, Peeples Construction Company, Inc. (contractor), of its intent to rely on the construction bond for payment 45...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases