1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 61 F.3d
  5. 61 F.3d 1402 (1995)
 

U.S. EX REL. LINDENTHAL v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP.

Nos. 93-16690, 94-16005 and 93-16823.

61 F.3d 1402 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Murray W. LINDENTHAL; Donald B. Willis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Murray W. LINDENTHAL; Donald B. Willis, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 2, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray W. Lindenthal, pro se, San Jose, CA, and Donald B. Willis, pro se, Hollister, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees.

Michael T. Kavanaugh, Susan A. Mitchell, Mark R. Troy and Erik F. Stidham, McKenna & Cuneo, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee-cross-appellant.

Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

These appeals arise out of an action under the False Claims Act (FCA).1 The relators prosecuted the action on their own after the government declined to intervene.

The relators' theory of the case is as follows: General Dynamics (GD) contracted with the Air Force (AF) to produce, and provide engineering drawings for, an elaborate radar system called...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases