BOBO v. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE

No. 94-3311.

52 F.3d 1406 (1995)

William Earl BOBO; Jack Mitchell, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided May 5, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Thomas Blankenship (argued), Blankenship & Robbins, Indianapolis, IN, John M. Harmon (briefed), Boyce C. Cabiness (briefed), Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody, Austin, TX, for petitioners.

Jeffrey Alan Knishkowy (argued and briefed), U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC, for respondent.

Before: MILBURN and NELSON, Circuit Judges; JOINER, District Judge.


MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners William Earl Bobo and Jack Mitchell seek review of the decision of the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to the Horse Protection Act ("HPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1821, et seq., assessing civil penalties and prohibiting petitioners from showing or entering horses for a period of two years, based upon the finding that petitioners had on two previous occasions showed a Tennessee Walking Horse, Ultimate Beam, at a horse show while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases