SPRINGFIELD POLICE ASS'N v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD

UP-37-94; CA A84788.

894 P.2d 546 (1995)

134 Or. App. 26

SPRINGFIELD POLICE ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 26, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Hoag, Eugene, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief, was Hoag, Garrettson & Goldberg.

Timothy J. Harold, Springfield, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief were Joseph Trudeau and Harold & Leahy.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner Springfield Police Association seeks review of an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB) that held that respondent City of Springfield did not commit an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain regarding two of petitioner's contract proposals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

This dispute relates to negotiations for a successor to the 1991-94 contract between respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases