1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 909 F.Supp.
  5. 909 F.Supp. 525 (1995)
 

PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. v. BANKERS TRUST CO.

No. C-1-94-735.

909 F.Supp. 525 (1995)

The PROCTER & GAMBLE CO., Plaintiff, v. BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

December 20, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie Gordon Fagen, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for Lavins.

Richard H. Klapper, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for Bankers Trust.

John D. Luken, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, OH, for P & G.

OPINION AND ORDER UPHOLDING THE ASSERTION OF SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE BY JACK AND ROBIN LAVIN

FEIKENS, District Judge.

I. Background

In this complex derivative instruments case, Plaintiff Procter & Gamble ("P & G") has sought extensive discovery from Defendants Bankers Trust Company and BT Securities Corporation ("BT"). A large part of this discovery has focused on what has been termed the "Bankers Trust tapes," recordings made by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases