DOE v. REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH

Nos. C9-94-1786 and C3-94-1797.

531 N.W.2d 897 (1995)

John W. DOE, Respondent, v. REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH, Appellant (C3-94-1797), Respondent (C9-94-1786), Minnesota North District of the Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod, et al., Defendants, Pastor Daniel Reeb, Appellant (C9-94-1786), Respondent (C3-94-1797).

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted July 20, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey R. Anderson, Mark A. Wendorf, Barbara J. Felt, Reinhardt and Anderson, St. Paul, for John W. Doe.

Richard L. Pemberton, Jr., Christopher J. Schulte, William D. Flaskamp, Meagher & Geer, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, for Redeemer Lutheran Church.

Kenneth F. Daniels, Golden Valley, for Daniel Reeb.

Considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., SCHUMACHER and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Redeemer Lutheran Church (Redeemer) and Pastor Daniel Reeb appeal the judgment and order denying their post-trial motions. Redeemer and Reeb contend that respondent John W. Doe's claim was time-barred. Redeemer also argues that the jury's finding that it was negligent is not supported by the evidence and the delayed discovery statute does not apply to a respondeat superior claim. We affirm.

FACTS

In May 1991,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases