1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 531 N.W.2d
  5. 531 N.W.2d 891 (1995)
 

HASNUDEEN v. ONAN CORP.

No. CX-94-2106.

531 N.W.2d 891 (1995)

Robert HASNUDEEN and Tracy Hines, Appellants, v. ONAN CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted July 20, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Beens, Brad J. Miller, Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellants.

John M. Anderson, Mark R. Whitmore, Bassford, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and RANDALL and MANSUR, JJ.

OPINION

MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge.

Appellants brought this suit alleging that respondent violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act by unlawfully discriminating against appellants. Appellants challenge the trial court's denial of their posttrial motion for amended findings or for a new trial. Appellants argue that reversal is warranted because: (1) the trial court erroneously implemented a mixed motive analysis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases