STATE v. PHABSOMPHOU

No. C5-94-2093.

530 N.W.2d 876 (1995)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Viengkhane PHABSOMPHOU, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 29, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Atty., Gayle C. Hendley, Asst. County Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Keith Jackson, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant.

Considered and decided by HARTEN, P.J., TOUSSAINT, C.J., and HUSPENI, J.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant claims that his rights to a jury trial and to due process were abrogated by the district court's decision to hold his probation revocation hearing prior to his criminal trial on the new charges that formed the basis for the probation revocation. Because we conclude that appellant's constitutional rights were not violated by the revocation proceedings and because the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure do not mandate postponement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases