1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 70 F.3d
  5. 70 F.3d 1332 (1995)
 

ANDES v. FORD MOTOR CO.

Nos. 94-7252, 94-7253.

70 F.3d 1332 (1995)

Bruce S. ANDES, et al., Louis S. Aronica, et al., Appellants, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 8, 1995.

Rehearing Denied January 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Dobrovir, argued the cause, for appellants. Cornish F. Hitchcock entered an appearance.

Robert N. Eccles, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellee. Michael J. O'Reilly entered an appearance.

Before: WALD, SILBERMAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Appellants challenge the district court's summary judgment determining that Ford Motor Company's decision to sell its Dealer Computer Services (DCS) subsidiary, and the resulting loss of benefits to the DCS employees, did not violate § 204(g) or § 510 of ERISA. Since no Ford benefit plan was amended as required by § 204(g) and Ford did not "discharge, fine, suspend, expel, discipline, or discriminate" against a DCS employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases