WASH. CTY. POL. OFFICERS v. WASH. CTY.

ERB UP-42-92; CA A75956; SC S41346, S41350.

900 P.2d 483 (1995)

321 Or. 430

WASHINGTON COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, Respondent on Review, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, Petitioner on Review, and Employment Relations Board, Intervenor/Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided August 24, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Junkin, Washington County Counsel, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Philip Schradle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for intervenor/petitioner on review. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

William B. Aitchison, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, UNIS and GRABER, JJ.


GILLETTE, Justice.

In this labor relations case, the Washington County Police Officers Association (the Association) filed two unfair labor practice complaints against Washington County (County) for unilaterally adopting a Complaint Investigations Procedures Manual that allegedly infringed on employees' rights to union representation during investigatory interviews.1 We are asked to decide whether the Employment Relations Board (ERB) correctly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases