1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 530 N.W.2d
  5. 530 N.W.2d 852 (1995)
 

WILLIAMS v. ST. PAUL RAMSEY MED. CENTER

No. C9-94-2257.

530 N.W.2d 852 (1995)

Sarah E. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. ST. PAUL RAMSEY MEDICAL CENTER, INCORPORATED, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted June 23, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Hennessey, Ansis V. Viksnins, Lindquist & Vennum, Minneapolis, for appellant, Sarah E. Williams.

Pat Skoglund, Thomas M. Countryman, Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, St. Paul, for respondent.

Douglas A. Hedin, Daniel S. Goldberg, Elizabeth A. Glidden, Minneapolis, for amicus curiae Minn. Chapter, Nat. Employment Lawyers Ass'n.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., LANSING and SHORT, JJ.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Sarah E. Williams contends the district court erred in ruling the exclusivity of remedies provision of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn.Stat. §§ 363.01-.15 (1992), barred her from bringing both a retaliation claim against respondent St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center (Ramsey) under Minn.Stat. § 181.932, subd. 1(a) (1992) (Whistleblower Statute), and a reprisal claim under the MHRA.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases