OPINION
PER CURIAM.
This matter came before the Supreme Court on February 21, 1995, pursuant to an order directing both the state and the defendant, William Ackerman, to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. In this case the defendant has appealed from a conviction of witness intimidation and making threatening telephone calls. He argues that the trial justice erroneously admitted into evidence testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.