1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 539 N.W.2d
  5. 539 N.W.2d 802 (1995)
 

MANDERFELD v. KROVITZ

No. C0-95-858.

539 N.W.2d 802 (1995)

James H. MANDERFELD, Respondent, v. Frances KROVITZ, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 25, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry M. Nord, Duluth, for respondent.

A. Blake MacDonald, MacDonald & Downs, Duluth, for appellant.

Considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and LANSING and FOLEY, JJ.

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

The trial court ordered reformation of an option contract based upon jury findings of fraud and mutual mistake. The contract was reformed by adding the name of a party's spouse/joint tenant despite the fact that she was not a party to the agreement and never consented to it. We reverse.

FACTS

In April 1983, James Manderfeld and Sam Krovitz executed an option agreement regarding commercial property that Krovitz was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases