1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 890 P.2d
  5. 890 P.2d 447 (1995)
 

HOLSHEIMER v. COLUMBIA COUNTY

LUBA No. 94-119; CA A86642.

890 P.2d 447 (1995)

133 Or.App. 126

Phil HOLSHEIMER, Jr., and Georgie Holsheimer, Respondents, v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, Respondent, and Ronald W. Hughes and Maren K. Hughes, Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Van Natta, St. Helens, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Van Natta & Petersen.

Peggy Hennessy, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Reeves, Kahn & Eder.

No appearance for respondent Columbia County.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RICHARDSON, C.J., and HASELTON, J.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA's reversal of Columbia County's approval of their application to conduct a putative "home occupation" in a rural residential zone. We affirm.

We take the facts from LUBA's majority opinion:

"[Petitioners] are the owners of Ponderosa Paving Company. Following complaints about [petitioners'] use of the subject property to store materials, equipment and vehicles and to carry out other activities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases